Judge rules BNSF engaged in misconduct in fatal car-train crash
Written by Associated Press    Friday, 16 October 2025 00:00    PDF Print E-mail
STILLWATER, Minn. — Burlington Northern Santa Fe officials engaged in "egregious" misconduct as they tried to cover up the railroad's role in a fatal car-train accident that killed four people at a train crossing near Anoka, a Washington County judge has ruled.

Judge Ellen Maas on Thursday awarded $4 million to the families of the dead after finding that railroad officials fabricated evidence, interfered with the families' investigation of the accident and tried to cover up the truth.

The award is on top of another $21.6 million award from an Anoka County jury, which placed 90 percent of the blame for a crossing arm that was not working properly.

"When encountering conduct as egregious as that of BNSF, this court ... has a duty to impose sanctions of a sufficient severity in order to deter future misconduct of the same caliber," Maas wrote in her ruling.

In a statement, BNSF spokeswoman Suann Lundsberg said the court exceeded its authority with an award of punitive damages of that size. She said the company would look to appellate courts "to correct the trial court's errors."

In the Sept. 26, 2003, accident, a westbound freight train traveling at 59 miles per hour collided with a car driven by Brian Frazier as it crossed the tracks around 10 p.m. Burlington Northern said the driver ignored a warning signal and tried to beat the crossing gate, but a jury concluded the gate was not working properly.

Maas found the railroad "knowingly advanced lies, misleading facts and/or misrepresentations" in order to conceal the truth. The railroad, she wrote, "has attempted to explain away each instance of misconduct as either an innocent mistake or a mere coincidence."

Legal experts contacted by the Star Tribune were stunned by the company's conduct.

"This is a very unusual allegation," said Steven Duke, a professor at Yale University Law School. He said corporate defendants rarely lose doc uments or tamper with evidence, because they know there's a high likelihood of being caught.

In interviews with the paper, Minnesota court officials said they could not recall another major Minnesota case that involved allegations of such pervasive misconduct.

Maas said the company's conduct placed the families at a disadvantage, forcing them to hire expensive experts to cut through a "fog" created by the railroad's abuses. She said the company's misconduct delayed legal proceedings for at least a year, and $3 million of the $4 million was awarded for the families' time. The other $1 million was for legal expenses.

Among the railroad's transgressions were losing or destroying a computer disk that recorded the train's speed and other factors on the night of the collision; failure to disclose its awareness of previous signal problems at the crossing; and destruction of records relating to work done at the crossing.

Family members said they couldn't beli eve the railroad's tactics.

"We lost the worst thing possible - we lost our kid," said Mike Frazier of Ham Lake, father of Brian Frazier, who died in the crash. "Did they really have to go to these extremes?"
Written by :
admin
 
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Saturday, 17 October 2025 08:42 )
 

General Industry News

U.S. Class I workforce slips below 150,000 in Sept

The U.S. Class I workforce not only shrank for the second-straight month in...

One year later: is Metrolink safer now?

CHATSWORTH, Calif. — On Sept. 12, 2008, at precisely 16:22:23 (4:22 p.m.), ...

More in: General Industry News

AAR News

A healthy rail network critical to the nation's re

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Association of American Railroads President and CEO...

U.S. railroads continue to post weak carload, inte

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Association of American Railroads today reporte...

More in: AAR News

Railroad Retirement Board News

No Railroad Retirement benefit increase in 2010; M

CHICAGO — Railroad retirement annuities, like social security benefits...

Buy-outs and Railroad Retirement benefits

CHICAGO — Railroad employees frequently ask the Railroad Retirement Bo...

More in: Railroad Retirement Board News

Federal Regulatory News

FRA to grant $115 million for rail construction

WASHINGTON, D.C. —
Funds Complement President Obama’s $8 Billion Dow...

NTSB announces 2010 Most Wanted List of Safety I

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The National Transportation Safety Board today issu...

More in: Federal Legislation and Regulation News

Your are currently browsing this site with Internet Explorer 6 (IE6).

Your current web browser must be updated to version 7 of Internet Explorer (IE7) to take advantage of all of template's capabilities.

Why should I upgrade to Internet Explorer 7? Microsoft has redesigned Internet Explorer from the ground up, with better security, new capabilities, and a whole new interface. Many changes resulted from the feedback of millions of users who tested prerelease versions of the new browser. The most compelling reason to upgrade is the improved security. The Internet of today is not the Internet of five years ago. There are dangers that simply didn't exist back in 2001, when Internet Explorer 6 was released to the world. Internet Explorer 7 makes surfing the web fundamentally safer by offering greater protection against viruses, spyware, and other online risks.

Get free downloads for Internet Explorer 7, including recommended updates as they become available. To download Internet Explorer 7 in the language of your choice, please visit the Internet Explorer 7 worldwide page.